Discover Samba Nova's Impressive Inference Speed - Challenging Groq's Dominance

Discover Samba Nova's impressive inference speed, challenging Groq's dominance. Explore the performance comparison between the two AI platforms and their capabilities in generating high-quality text at lightning-fast speeds.

July 12, 2024


Discover the power of cutting-edge AI technology with our latest blog post. Explore the impressive capabilities of SambaNova, a new player in the AI landscape, as it challenges the industry leader Groq in lightning-fast token generation. Learn how these innovative platforms are pushing the boundaries of language model performance and offering businesses and individuals a wealth of opportunities to harness the potential of generative AI.

Blazing Fast Inference Speed: Comparing SambaNova and Groq

Both SambaNova and Groq offer impressive inference speeds, with SambaNova's platform capable of over 1,000 tokens per second and Groq's platform reaching around 12,200 tokens per second for the same prompts. While Groq maintains the edge in raw speed, SambaNova's performance is still remarkable, especially when compared to other offerings in the market.

The comparison highlights the consistent performance of both platforms, with similar summaries generated for the same prompts. Both platforms were able to effectively summarize a lengthy text from Paul Graham, demonstrating their ability to handle longer-form content.

In terms of features, Groq provides a free API that allows interaction with multiple models, including Lamda 3. SambaNova, on the other hand, focuses more on enterprise-level offerings, requiring a paid account to access their API. However, SambaNova does offer open-source models that users can download and experiment with on their local machines.

The availability of multiple high-performance platforms is a positive development, as it provides users with more options and flexibility in choosing the solution that best fits their needs. The competition between these companies is likely to drive further innovation and improvements in inference speed and capabilities.

Battle of the Giants: SambaNova vs. Groq on Language Models

Both Groq and SambaNova are leading companies in the field of dedicated hardware for language models, offering impressive inference speeds. In this comparison, we'll pit their performance against each other using the popular Llama 38B model.

Firstly, we tested a simple prompt, "What is generative AI?", on both platforms. Groq delivered a lightning-fast response of around 12,200 tokens per second, while SambaNova clocked in at a still impressive 1,000 tokens per second.

Next, we tried a more complex prompt, "Draft an email following up with a customer after an introductory sales call." Here, Groq maintained its lead, generating around 11,100 tokens per second, compared to SambaNova's consistent 1,000 tokens per second.

To truly test the limits of their inference speed, we used a longer, 5-page text from a Paul Graham essay on "How to Do Great Work." Both platforms handled this challenge admirably, with Groq generating around 1,200 tokens per second and SambaNova maintaining its 1,000 tokens per second pace.

The summaries produced by both platforms were remarkably consistent, highlighting key points such as choosing a field that aligns with your aptitude and interests, learning about the field's frontiers, identifying gaps in knowledge, and pursuing promising ideas.

While Groq maintains its position as the speed leader, SambaNova has proven to be a formidable contender, offering impressive performance that is on par with the industry standard. The availability of multiple high-performance options is a boon for developers and researchers, providing flexibility and choice in their language model deployments.

Multilingual Capabilities: SambaNova's Unique Approach

SambaNova's platform not only offers impressive inference speeds, but also boasts a unique focus on multilingual capabilities. In addition to the Llama 3.8B model, the SambaNova platform includes dedicated models for various languages, such as SambaNova Lingo for Arabic, Bulgarian, Hungarian, and Russian. This multilingual approach aims to create specialized models tailored to different language requirements, going beyond the single Llama 3.8B model shared by both SambaNova and Anthropic's Colab.

By developing these dedicated multilingual models, SambaNova is positioning itself as a platform that can cater to a diverse range of language needs, potentially offering improved performance and accuracy for non-English languages compared to a more generalized model. This focus on multilingualism aligns with the growing demand for language-specific AI solutions in an increasingly globalized world.

Pushing the Limits: Handling Longer Texts and Summarization

To test the real inference speed of the Croc and Samba NOA platforms, the speaker used a longer text from one of Paul Graham's letters, which was about 5 pages long. The prompt was to summarize the text.

When running the longer text through Samba NOA's Lama 3 model, the platform was able to process it at a rate of around 1,000 tokens per second, which the speaker considered impressive. Similarly, when the same text was run through the Croc platform, the speed was around 1,200 tokens per second.

The summary generated by both platforms was consistent, highlighting the key points of the original text. The speaker noted that Croc is still considered the gold standard for inference speed, but it's great to see that other platforms like Samba NOA are also capable of generating text at a similar pace.

The speaker also mentioned that Croc provides a free API that allows interaction with not only Lama 3 but also other models, and it recently added the ability to use Vision models. On the other hand, Samba NOA's focus seems to be more on enterprise customers, and users would need to sign up for a paid account to access their API, although they do have some open-source models available for local experimentation.

Overall, the speaker concluded that having multiple options for high-speed text generation is a positive development, as it pushes the boundaries of what's possible in the field of generative AI.

Choosing Your AI Platform: Groq's Free API vs. SambaNova's Enterprise Focus

Both Groq and SambaNova offer impressive language models and inference speeds, providing users with compelling options for their AI needs. Groq's free API allows developers to access not only the Lamda 3 model, but also other models in their lineup, including the ability to use vision models. This accessibility makes Groq an attractive choice for those looking to experiment and integrate AI capabilities into their projects.

On the other hand, SambaNova's focus appears to be more on the enterprise market. While they offer a free playground for users to explore their models, including their own proprietary models like SambaLingo, they do not currently provide a free API. Users interested in leveraging SambaNova's technology will need to sign up for a paid account to access their API.

In terms of performance, both platforms have demonstrated impressive inference speeds, with SambaNova's Lamda 3 model consistently delivering around 1,000 tokens per second, while Groq's performance can reach up to 1,200 tokens per second. This level of speed is remarkable and showcases the advancements in AI hardware and software.

Ultimately, the choice between Groq and SambaNova will depend on the user's specific needs and requirements. Groq's free API and broader model selection may appeal to developers and researchers, while SambaNova's enterprise focus may be more suitable for larger organizations with specific AI-driven business needs.


The speed comparison between Croc and the Samba NOA platform reveals that both platforms offer impressive performance when it comes to language model inference. While Croc remains the gold standard, with its ability to generate around 12,200 tokens per second on the given prompt, the Samba NOA platform is not far behind, consistently delivering around 1,000 tokens per second.

The Samba NOA platform's performance is particularly noteworthy, as it demonstrates the potential for other companies to challenge Croc's dominance in the field of high-speed language model inference. The platform's ability to handle longer text, such as the summary of the Paul Graham letter, at a rate of around 1,000 tokens per second is a testament to its capabilities.

Both platforms offer unique advantages and features. Croc provides a free API that allows users to interact with a variety of models, including Lama 3, while Samba NOA's focus seems to be more on enterprise-level solutions, requiring a paid account to access their API. However, the availability of open-source models from Samba NOA provides an alternative for those who prefer to work with the platform's models locally.

Overall, the speed comparison highlights the ongoing advancements in the field of language model inference, with Samba NOA emerging as a strong contender in the race for high-performance AI platforms. The existence of multiple options is beneficial for the AI community, as it fosters competition and drives further innovation in this rapidly evolving field.